Yamato · Chapter 1 of 6Choose a chapter

6–7 April 1945 · The final operation · Chapter 01 of 6

The Last Sortie

At 1520 on 6 April, Yamato sailed from Japan. Her destination was a battle already being fought around Okinawa. Her task was to reach it.

Article · Updated 21 October 2026 · Sources for this page

The force that left Japan was small enough to name: Yamato, the cruiser Yahagi and eight destroyers—Fuyutsuki, Suzutsuki, Isokaze, Hamakaze, Yukikaze, Asashimo, Hatsushimo and Kasumi. The departure roster describes the ships committed to the operation. It does not mean that every vessel could remain with the formation throughout its passage. YT-Y05

Their destination lay to the south. The written order called for entry into waters west of Okinawa at dawn on 8 April, cooperation with Japanese air and local forces, and attacks on enemy warships and transports. Reaching those waters was the first requirement. The ships would have to pass through an area in which American carrier aircraft could search for and attack them. YT-Y05

A mission measured against its means

Yamato carried the power of a battleship, but that power could not be applied at any distance she chose. Her guns needed targets within reach. Aircraft could find and strike a formation long before a surface engagement began.

Commander T. Miyamoto, a gunnery staff officer who survived, later described both the mission and the air attacks. His account makes the imbalance clear: the Japanese ships had to defend themselves while successive groups of aircraft approached. His recollection also distinguishes limited early fighter cover from the absence of effective cover during the decisive attacks. Saying that no Japanese fighter was ever present would erase that distinction. YT-Y01

Contact in the darkness

That evening, USS Threadfin encountered the outward-bound force. Her patrol report records two large ships and a screen of smaller vessels, but admits uncertainty about their identities. One large ship was initially thought possibly to be a carrier; a later note identifies it as Yamato. Threadfin sent contact reports and tried to reach a torpedo position, but speed and course changes carried the opportunity away. YT-Y24

Her orders gave the initial report priority over attacking. The submarine’s account describes that requirement being lifted later in the evening. It supplies a close view of detection and pursuit, without proving that a torpedo attack would have succeeded or tracing every subsequent command decision.

Hackleback also tracked the force. Her report describes a nearby destroyer repeatedly closing towards her, forcing turns away from the main formation. A transmitter failure complicated reporting, although the crew heard their messages repeated on the fleet broadcast. The two submarine accounts show separate positions and difficulties in following the same movement. YT-Y25

Before the familiar ending

Yamato never reached the intended battle area off Okinawa. Her own surviving report places her loss on the afternoon of 7 April. But the ending should not replace the questions that came before it. Who ordered the sortie? What were the ships expected to accomplish? What fuel was authorised, what was supplied, and what would have been required to return?

Those questions produce a more demanding story than a battleship sent out with “only enough fuel for one way.” The surviving evidence includes contemporary instructions, a shortened battle report and postwar testimony. They describe different things, and they do not yield one certified departure inventory.

The chapters that follow separate the mission from its execution, and the operation’s intended sacrifice from its practical fuel arrangements. They also keep the men within the story. A report written after the sinking can describe the loss of a ship; it cannot recover every experience aboard her. YT-Y04

Evidence within reach

Sources for this page

Open a note for the passage, inspection status and limits. Source records link to the available documents.

YT-Y25USS Hackleback: Report of First War Patrol

Original wartime patrol report · digitised microfilm; separate retrospective Navy history bound into the scan

Passage: First patrol printed pp.16–18 / PDF pp.21–23: radar tracking, reporting and loss of contact

Radar contact on 6 April; reported destroyer approaches; four contact reports; transmitter failure and repair; receipt of rebroadcast reports; loss of contact and return towards assigned patrol area.

Checked: Selected images visually checked on 21 October 2026: PDF pp.3, 5, 7 and 21–23. Complete public archive scan retained with SHA-256 47c58d73ddabb37aab3950a1e19a423d8db4c68d680ee9892b9d1eff67d6fc87. Contact entries read from images, not inferred from search snippets.

Limits: Radar estimates and the commander’s interpretations, not a verified roster of Japanese ships. Times retained with the original I notation. The separate Navy history identifies the force as Yamato’s retrospectively; its sinking and casualty figures are not adopted. The patrol covering letter ends its period on 26 April, while that history gives arrival at Midway on 27 April; no reconciled end date is asserted. A report being rebroadcast is not proof of receipt or action by every command. No direct sighting of Yamato’s sinking or successful torpedo attack is claimed.

View full source record →
YT-Y24USS Threadfin: Report of War Patrol Number Two

Original wartime patrol report · digitised microfilm scan

Passage: Second patrol printed pp.12–14 / PDF pp.69–71: contact, reports and loss of contact

Contact with Yamato’s force on 6 April; uncertain identification; initial reporting priority before attack; unsuccessful torpedo positioning; further signals; loss of contact and news of the air attack.

Checked: Six selected page images visually inspected on 20 October 2026. Complete scan retained from the Maritime Park Association’s publicly linked file. SHA-256 d4d3886fc5769eba93cfebd5940bb035ea18101779f29bb197f480d36ab98575. The scan has no usable extracted text for these entries; claims were checked against the images.

Limits: Participant patrol report submitted after events, not an independently verified signal-receipt log. Times retained in the report’s ITEM convention. Contemporary ship counts, speeds and identifications are estimates. The written reporting instruction and cancellation signal are described by Foote, not separately inspected order originals. Does not establish what an unmade attack would have achieved, or by itself reconstruct the carrier command decision.

View full source record →
YT-Y04Yamato’s abbreviated battle report

Contemporary report · Japanese archival facsimile

Passage: C08030566400, images 2–3 and 8: report scope, departure and loss

Report identity, actual departure and recorded loss time.

Checked: Selected original page images checked in successive research passes, including image 2’s omitted section.

Limits: Working readings, not a complete translation. Own-force-status section omitted. Precise time entries are reported values; casualty totals and coordinates are not certified.

View full source record →
YT-Y05Second Destroyer Squadron orders and battle records, part 3

Contemporary orders and reports · Japanese archival facsimile

Passage: C08030103200, images 74–78: Operation Order No. 3, mission and force

Mission west of Okinawa, departure force and ordered fuel transfers.

Checked: Selected archive page images inspected; the 92-image file is retained for research. Images 75–76 rechecked on 21 October 2026 for the first/second organisations and 41dg grouping with Yamato in a surface engagement.

Limits: Selected working readings, not full translation. Orders do not prove execution or delivery. Complete beaching instructions and final fuel inventory remain unverified.

View full source record →
YT-Y01Miyamoto on Yamato’s final operation

Postwar witness interview through modern transcription

Passage: NAV 32, printed pp.136–140: mission, air cover and attacks

Mission, attack sequence, air cover and the survivor’s perspective.

Checked: Published transcript read; all seven images of the related typescript were inspected in the research audit.

Limits: The transcript and typescript are the same testimony, not independent witnesses. Times, counts and identifications remain uncertain. Original typescript is separately accessible as YT-Y02; both preserve FUYUZUKI in the force list and FUKUZUKI in the rescue passage.

View full source record →

Photograph

Enlarged historical photograph

Web copy resized and compressed; original framing retained. Open image file ↗