A connected ship profile

USS Bunker Hill (CV-17)

The attack did not end when the weapons were released. Bunker Hill’s flight deck was also the destination for crews bringing damaged aircraft home.

Profile · Evidence and limits

An aircraft carrier underway, seen from above its port quarter, with aircraft arranged on the flight deck.

19 January 1945 · catalogue attribution

USS Bunker Hill underway in Puget Sound, in an official US Navy photograph catalogued as 19 January 1945.

US Navy / Wikimedia Commons · Source · Public domain (source statement)

Date and location follow the Commons reproduction of the official Navy caption. This is not a photograph of the Yamato attack. The original Navy catalogue page has not been independently retrieved in this pass. Commons marks the photograph public domain under PD-USN.

Several kinds of aircraft, one flight deck

On 7 April 1945, Bunker Hill sent aircraft against the Japanese surface force heading towards Okinawa. Two surviving squadron reports give different views of that operation: VF-84’s Corsairs carried bombs and rockets, while VT-84’s Avengers carried torpedoes. Their supporting-aircraft tables also list ten Helldivers and two Hellcats. These are figures for the strike, not the carrier’s entire aircraft complement. YT-Y26 YT-Y27

The reports make the relationship between ship and aircraft tangible. The carrier supplied a place to launch, assemble a mixed force and recover the survivors. What happened between departure and return depended on weather, coordination and each crew’s decisions.

Bombs and rockets through cloud

VF-84’s report lists fifteen F4U-1Ds taking off, each with a 500-pound bomb and eight rockets. Its attack table records fourteen aircraft attacking Yamato, fourteen bombs and 112 rockets, with one hit claimed and the resulting damage unknown. The opening table instead puts fifteen in its attacking column. The profile preserves that difference rather than silently making the entries agree. YT-Y26

The loss sheet records one Corsair destroyed in an operational loss of unknown cause and its pilot missing. The narrative describes an aircraft diving steeply out of cloud and crashing into the sea. This is not recorded as an aircraft shot down by Japanese fire.

Cloud and haze also limited what the returning pilots could establish about the ships below. The narrative’s broader claims of destruction cannot, by themselves, allocate the sinking of a particular ship to this squadron.

Closing on Yamato

VT-84’s cover sheet records fourteen TBM-3s launched and thirteen attacking. Its narrative describes locating the enemy with radar, finding an opening through the cloud and dividing the squadron to approach Yamato from different directions. The intention was to make a turn away from one group expose the ship to another. YT-Y27

The account describes intense gunfire during the final approach. Lieutenant (junior grade) Richard John Walsh’s aircraft was seen burning and crashing before releasing its torpedo. The casualty table lists him and his two crewmen as missing in action. That is the status recorded in this report, not a later reconciliation of their fate.

The attack table claims nine torpedo hits. It is a squadron claim made amid a much larger attack, not nine independently confirmed hits attributable to Bunker Hill. The table also refers to an enclosed special report that is not present as a separately identified document in this six-image copy.

Getting back aboard

Thirteen Avengers are recorded as returning. Several had been hit. Ensign C. E. Webster’s aircraft suffered a fire and undercarriage damage; the narrative says he landed with seven gallons of fuel remaining. Lieutenant (junior grade) D. F. Ray’s crew threw equipment overboard to lighten their damaged aircraft. YT-Y27

Those details restore something a simple list of carriers misses: a successful attack still left crews facing a long flight and a difficult landing. They also explain why aircraft returned and aircraft fit for further service are different measures.

Compare Bennington and her squadrons’ separate choices, or return to Under Carrier Attack.

Evidence within reach

Sources for this page

Open a note for the passage, inspection status and limits. Source records link to the available documents.

YT-Y26Bunker Hill: VF-84 aircraft action report 40

Original aircraft action report · digitised microfilm scan

Passage: Report 40, PDF pp.1–4: aircraft, weapons, loss, attack table and narrative

F4U-1D load, participating aircraft, operational loss, attack table and narrative on 7 April 1945.

Checked: All retained PDF images visually inspected on 21 October 2026; catalogue and unit/report fields compared. SHA-256 ab6ae52f0158d40c696a8eeda3b4f1aa121da0dc32ca423d0864aeb56539e24c.

Limits: Four images are present although the forms say sheets 1–4 of 5; no fifth sheet is claimed as inspected. The opening table says 15 attacking, the attack table 14; the latter records one hit and unknown damage. Narrative destruction claims are not reconciled enemy losses. The loss is classified operational, cause unknown; missing status is not a later casualty determination. Photographs are said to have been destroyed in a fire, whose date is not established here.

View full source record →
YT-Y27Bunker Hill: VT-84 aircraft action report VT-38

Original aircraft action report · digitised microfilm scan

Passage: Report VT-38, PDF pp.1–6: VT-84 aircraft, casualties, tactics and return

TBM-3 aircraft, torpedo attack on Yamato, cloud and radar, loss before release, damaged aircraft and return.

Checked: All retained PDF images visually inspected on 21 October 2026; catalogue and unit/report fields compared. SHA-256 dabdc19601fb1037e264f3e45aa6ad306ca0b00648292cbe1d19f66e3fbda0d6.

Limits: VT-38 is the report number; the reporting squadron is VT-84. Six images were inspected; both final images use the sheet 5 form. A special report is referenced but is not separately identified in this copy. Nine hits are an American squadron claim, not independently confirmed allocations. Opening and attack-table aircraft figures are not fully consistent. The narrative supplies individual experiences, not a reconciled Japanese damage assessment or final casualty roll. Ammunition records are marked lost in fire.

View full source record →

Photograph

Enlarged historical photograph

Web copy resized and compressed; original framing retained. Open image file ↗