Sōryū

The same aircraft, a different weapon

Sōryū’s contribution to the island strike included eighteen carrier attack aircraft and nine fighters. These attack aircraft belonged to the category that could also carry torpedoes, but their mission against Midway was bombing. Aircraft type, weapon load and target need to be read together. M14

The formation table is a record of that attack allocation. It is not an inventory of the ship’s full air group or a statement that every aircraft remained available for the next mission.

Fire spreading through the carrier

The First Air Fleet report describes several bomb hits followed rapidly by fire and explosions involving ammunition and aviation fuel. Both engines stopped, and attempts to manoeuvre could not recover control of the burning ship. The order to abandon followed soon after in the report’s sequence. M14

This was more than damage to a runway at sea. A carrier’s ability to fight depended on movement, machinery, communications, fuel handling and the people operating them. The loss of several of those functions could end flying operations while the hull remained afloat.

Evacuation was not one moment

The account describes an explosion throwing men into the water, efforts to recover them and medical attention on the forward deck. Survivors were transferred to Hamakaze and Isokaze. Later, when the fires appeared to ease, the acting commander considered returning a firefighting party aboard. The report then records the ship’s sinking. M14

The Japanese page names Isokaze (磯風). The English edition renders this as Isonami; the name here follows the original. M14

Its tribute to Captain Yanagimoto is also a reminder of the document’s purpose: this is a command account commemorating its dead as well as describing operations. Selected original pages have been checked, but the narrative is not a complete independent record of every person’s final movements. Its compressed sinking passage does not settle the role of scuttling.

Follow Midway Under Attack for the opening strike, The Morning Strikes for the carrier disaster and The People Left Behind for its human consequences.

Across the stories

Akagi

Nagumo’s flagship, her aircraft contribution and the fires that forced command to move to another ship.

Bombs and torpedoes at Midway

The weapons recorded in American and Japanese carrier sorties, and what their expenditure can tell us.

Hiryū

The Japanese carrier that launched two counterattacks after the morning disaster at Midway.

Isokaze

The Japanese destroyer that helped receive Sōryū’s survivors at Midway and later sailed in Yamato’s final force.

Kaga

A major part of Japan’s opening air attack, followed by the destruction of her bridge and a desperate fight against fire.

Nakajima B5N2 Kate

The three-seat Japanese carrier attack aircraft, its crew and its documented torpedo mission against Yorktown.

Mitsubishi A6M2 Zero

Japan’s carrier fighter, its armament and the competing demands of escort and fleet defence at Midway.

Appears in

Examine the sources ↓

Sources for this page

Open a note for the passage, inspection status and limits. Source records link to the available documents.

M14First Air Fleet detailed battle report

Contemporary Japanese command report · archival scan

Passage: PDF pp.17, 31 and 44–46 / stamped 0019, 0033 and 0046–0048: island attack, armament context, fire and evacuation

The carrier command’s reported assumptions, force organisation and the division of air attack, reconnaissance, support and supply tasks. The opening island strike, request for another attack and changing armament preparations. Hiryū’s counterattack aircraft, remaining strength and later fire emergency. Akagi, Kaga and Sōryū damage and evacuation; opening island-strike allocations.

Checked: Selected Japanese passages on PDF pp.10–11 and 14–15 visually checked for chapter 1. For chapter 4, pp.16–20 visually inspected and compared with M06’s English organisation tables; pp.21–22 inspected for context on 18 October 2026. For Midway Under Attack, PDF pp.29–33 / stamped 0031–0035 visually inspected and selected passages compared with M06; pp.23–26 sampled for context. For Search and Decision, PDF pp.32–33 / stamped 0034–0035 rechecked against M39’s chronological table. PDF pp.34–35 / stamped 0036–0037 visually inspected for The Morning Strikes; p.34 supports command transfer and Hiryū’s continued ability to attack. PDF pp.35–43 rendered and visually inspected for Hiryū Fights Back: pp.35–38 cover counterattack strength, claims and Hiryū’s bombing; pp.42–43 cover fire, propulsion failure and abandonment preparations. Intervening Akagi/Kaga passages inspected for context. PDF p.44 / stamped 0046 visually inspected for the continuation of Hiryū’s evacuation to destroyers. PDF p.18 / stamped 0020 re-rendered and visually inspected for Hiryū counterattack organisation. Ship-profile expansion: PDF pp.17, 39–42 and 44–46 rendered and visually inspected; selected damage passages compared with M06. Cruiser-profile review, 18–19 October 2026: PDF pp.32–33 / stamped 0034–0035 visually rechecked for the successive Tone No.4 reports and decisions. PDF p.45 / stamped 0047 visually rechecked on 21 October 2026 for the Isokaze profile: rescue, treatment and transfer to Hamakaze and Isokaze. The already retained scan was used; a fresh JACAR viewer request returned HTTP 403.

Limits: Working readings, not a certified full translation. The report was compiled after the battle and some tables include actual results, not just pre-battle plans. The English table’s Haruna aircraft type differs from the Japanese image; no type is assigned here. M06 transmits the same report family. Opening narrative compresses later attacks into the same paragraph. Its dates and times are not silently merged with the American chronology; message timing and flight-deck readiness require further records. Initial-contact timing differs between the narrative and M39’s chronological table; no fixed message delay is inferred. Predicted aircraft readiness is not a completed launch. Japanese counterattack target identities and claimed damage on these pages are not confirmed outcomes. Evacuation entries are not a complete personnel roll; scuttling orders and final sinking times remain distinct. Exact bomb-hit counts and the compressed Kaga/Sōryū terminal sinking passages do not settle scuttling contributions. Akagi command-transfer times differ within the report; no single minute is adopted. Sōryū evacuation: M14 PDF p.45 / stamped 0047 names Hamakaze and Isokaze (磯風); M06 renders the second as Isonami. The profile follows the original Japanese name.

View full source record →