Midway · Chapter 9 of 12Choose a chapter

4–5 June 1942 · Counterattack and damage control · Chapter 09 of 12

Hiryū Fights Back

Three Japanese carriers were burning, but Hiryū could still send aircraft into battle. Yorktown’s crew would fight to save their ship through two attacks in one afternoon.

Article · Updated 21 October 2026 · Sources for this page

Hiryū’s survival preserved a chance to strike back. While the other Japanese carriers struggled with fires, she launched a force recorded as eighteen dive bombers and six fighters. A later wave combined ten torpedo aircraft and six fighters, including aircraft from Akagi and Kaga. These were successive efforts from the remaining operational carrier, not a restored four-carrier striking force. M14

Their target was Yorktown. The American success that morning had not removed the need to detect incoming aircraft, intercept them and keep a damaged ship functioning.

The bombers arrive

Yorktown’s damage report records a radar warning at 1359 in its own chronology. Refuelling stopped. Aviation-fuel lines were drained and filled with carbon dioxide to reduce the danger of fire. These precautions were taken before the bombs arrived. M18

The report places three bomb hits at 1414. One opened a hole about twelve feet across in the flight deck, behind the second aircraft elevator. Fragments started fires in aircraft on the hangar deck below. Sprinklers and water curtains extinguished those fires, while repair crews patched the deck opening in about twenty-five minutes. M18

Another bomb struck the uptakes—the passages carrying exhaust from the boilers. The resulting damage interrupted steam production. Yorktown slowed sharply and, by 1440 in the report, her engines had stopped. A third hit started fires forward, near spaces containing aviation stores and above fuel storage. The nearby magazine group was flooded as a precaution. M18

Three hits had produced several different emergencies. A usable flight deck alone could not restore the carrier: she also needed steam, electrical power and control of the fires below.

Getting Yorktown moving

Repair parties worked on the damaged exhaust passages while engineers brought boilers back into service. At 1550, the engine room reported that the ship could make twenty knots or slightly better. She had recovered a substantial part of her mobility after stopping altogether. M18

That recovery was extraordinary, but incomplete. Some machinery remained damaged, and smouldering material in the forward rag stowage persisted beyond the afternoon. “Under control” did not mean every fire was out or every system restored. M18

It also makes the Japanese claims difficult to read without comparison. Their report describes attacks on an Enterprise-type carrier and gives damage estimates that cannot be accepted as confirmed ship identities or losses. The American damage record shows the same Yorktown suffering both the bombing and the later torpedo attack. M14 M18

The torpedoes strike

When another attack approached, the crew again interrupted refuelling and secured the aviation-fuel system. Yorktown manoeuvred to evade torpedoes, but two struck her port side. Steam and electrical power failed, the rudder jammed and the ship stopped. Flooding produced an increasing list. M18

The available reports disagree about the exact time. Captain Elliott Buckmaster’s action report puts the hits at about 1620; the technical damage report gives 1645. They also differ over the list at abandonment. Both rely on reconstructed recollections, and the technical account draws on the captain’s submissions. These are not two independent clocks that can simply be averaged. M04 M18

The essential damage sequence is clearer. The emergency diesel started, but electrical distribution could not be restored. Without power, the crew could not correct the worsening list. Buckmaster ordered abandonment because he feared the ship would soon capsize. Wounded men were lowered into rafts and boats from the escorting ships. M18 M04

Yorktown nevertheless remained afloat. The second attack had disabled her and forced her crew off; it had not yet sunk her. That distinction left room for a later attempt to save the ship.

Among the rescuers was Hammann, which recovered Yorktown personnel including Captain Buckmaster. The destroyer’s report traces his transfer to Astoria and the subsequent preparation of a salvage party. The escorts were already becoming the means by which men could return to the carrier as well as leave her. M44

Hiryū becomes the target

The remaining Japanese carrier was also exposed to attack. In the afternoon, American dive bombers found her. Bombing Squadron Six’s report describes fighters engaging before the dive began, the loss of one of its aircraft, and antiaircraft fire during the dive and withdrawal. The conditions differed from the opening experienced by the squadron during its morning attack. M17

The report records aircraft from Scouting Six, Bombing Three and Bombing Six diving on the carrier. Its precise hit claims remain claims, but its description of a burning carrier agrees with the Japanese report’s account of Hiryū’s emergency. Richard Best subsequently saw the carrier still burning and moving with the fleet. Being hit, losing the ability to operate aircraft and finally sinking were separate stages. M17 M14

Hiryū’s crew tried to escape the battle area and contain the fires. The Japanese account describes engine-room personnel continuing their work as heat and fire killed men below. The ship eventually lost propulsion. A period of hope that the fire could be controlled ended with another internal explosion. M14

The English edition records the evacuation to Kazagumo and Makigumo, with the carrier’s captain and Rear-Admiral Tamon Yamaguchi remaining aboard. It is the Japanese command report’s account, transmitted through a postwar translation, rather than an independently verified transcript of their final words. M06

Hiryū had inflicted a serious loss of American fighting power, but could not restore Japan’s carrier position. Yorktown lay abandoned yet afloat; the last Japanese flight deck was out of action. The fighting, rescue and salvage still to come would determine who survived and which ships could be brought home.

Evidence within reach

Sources for this page

Open a note for the passage, inspection status and limits. Source records link to the available documents.

M14First Air Fleet detailed battle report

Contemporary Japanese command report · archival scan

Passage: JACAR C08030023800 · PDF pp.34–38 and 42–43 / stamped 0036–0040 and 0044–0045: counterattacks, remaining aircraft and Hiryū’s fires

The carrier command’s reported assumptions, force organisation and the division of air attack, reconnaissance, support and supply tasks. The opening island strike, request for another attack and changing armament preparations. Hiryū’s counterattack aircraft, remaining strength and later fire emergency. Akagi, Kaga and Sōryū damage and evacuation; opening island-strike allocations.

Checked: Selected Japanese passages on PDF pp.10–11 and 14–15 visually checked for chapter 1. For chapter 4, pp.16–20 visually inspected and compared with M06’s English organisation tables; pp.21–22 inspected for context on 18 October 2026. For Midway Under Attack, PDF pp.29–33 / stamped 0031–0035 visually inspected and selected passages compared with M06; pp.23–26 sampled for context. For Search and Decision, PDF pp.32–33 / stamped 0034–0035 rechecked against M39’s chronological table. PDF pp.34–35 / stamped 0036–0037 visually inspected for The Morning Strikes; p.34 supports command transfer and Hiryū’s continued ability to attack. PDF pp.35–43 rendered and visually inspected for Hiryū Fights Back: pp.35–38 cover counterattack strength, claims and Hiryū’s bombing; pp.42–43 cover fire, propulsion failure and abandonment preparations. Intervening Akagi/Kaga passages inspected for context. PDF p.44 / stamped 0046 visually inspected for the continuation of Hiryū’s evacuation to destroyers. PDF p.18 / stamped 0020 re-rendered and visually inspected for Hiryū counterattack organisation. Ship-profile expansion: PDF pp.17, 39–42 and 44–46 rendered and visually inspected; selected damage passages compared with M06. Cruiser-profile review, 18–19 October 2026: PDF pp.32–33 / stamped 0034–0035 visually rechecked for the successive Tone No.4 reports and decisions. PDF p.45 / stamped 0047 visually rechecked on 21 October 2026 for the Isokaze profile: rescue, treatment and transfer to Hamakaze and Isokaze. The already retained scan was used; a fresh JACAR viewer request returned HTTP 403.

Limits: Working readings, not a certified full translation. The report was compiled after the battle and some tables include actual results, not just pre-battle plans. The English table’s Haruna aircraft type differs from the Japanese image; no type is assigned here. M06 transmits the same report family. Opening narrative compresses later attacks into the same paragraph. Its dates and times are not silently merged with the American chronology; message timing and flight-deck readiness require further records. Initial-contact timing differs between the narrative and M39’s chronological table; no fixed message delay is inferred. Predicted aircraft readiness is not a completed launch. Japanese counterattack target identities and claimed damage on these pages are not confirmed outcomes. Evacuation entries are not a complete personnel roll; scuttling orders and final sinking times remain distinct. Exact bomb-hit counts and the compressed Kaga/Sōryū terminal sinking passages do not settle scuttling contributions. Akagi command-transfer times differ within the report; no single minute is adopted. Sōryū evacuation: M14 PDF p.45 / stamped 0047 names Hamakaze and Isokaze (磯風); M06 renders the second as Isonami. The profile follows the original Japanese name.

View full source record →
M18Yorktown’s damage report

Technical report · third-party scan extract

Passage: PDF pp.4–5 / printed pp.1–2, paragraphs 1–12: bomb damage, repairs, torpedoes and abandonment

The sequence of damage, recovery, interrupted salvage and loss of Yorktown. Fuel precautions, flight-deck repair, boiler recovery, loss of power and abandonment.

Checked: PDF pages 4 and 17 visually inspected; other text selectively examined. PDF pp.4–5 rendered and visually rechecked on 18 October 2026 for Hiryū Fights Back. PDF p.6 / printed p.3 visually inspected for towing, salvage, the submarine attack and final loss. Supporting-ship update: PDF p.6 visually rechecked for Vireo’s tow and Hammann’s salvage assistance.

Limits: Relies on officers’ reconstructed recollections after records were lost. Cover publication date and complete plate set are absent from the retained extract. Draws on the captain’s submissions, so is not independent corroboration of M04. Its 1645 torpedo-hit time differs from M04’s approximately 1620, and its 23-degree abandonment list differs from M04’s 26 degrees. The paragraph 10 elapsed-time arithmetic is inconsistent; no exact repair duration is inferred from it. The post-Hammann underwater explosion is tentatively attributed to depth charges, whereas M44 leaves the cause unresolved. The smaller list after the later attack did not mean improved overall buoyancy.

View full source record →
M04Yorktown’s action report

Contemporary ship report reconstructed from memory · modern web transcription

Passage: Printed pp.3–4 and engineering chronology pp.21–22: repair, second attack and evacuation; modern transcription

Yorktown’s search and strike preparation, and the decision to retain aircraft against additional carriers.

Checked: Opening paragraphs reread on 18 October 2026. Original page images not inspected. Selected second-attack, abandonment and engineering passages reread for Hiryū Fights Back.

Limits: The report explicitly warns that its times are approximate and reconstructed from officers’ memories. Negative search results do not establish the absence of enemy carriers. Clock readings are not silently combined with the island or Japanese reports. Torpedo-hit timing and abandonment list differ from M18, which draws on the same underlying submissions; they are not independent confirmation.

View full source record →
M17Enterprise’s dive-bomber squadron reports

Contemporary squadron reports · third-party hosted scan extract

Passage: PDF p.5 / VB-6 printed p.5, paragraphs 2–7: afternoon attack and withdrawal

Reported bomb loads, oxygen difficulties, target-allocation confusion, fighter opposition, aircraft returns and Stuart Mason’s actions. Afternoon opposition, attacking squadrons and observations of a burning carrier still underway.

Checked: PDF pp.2–4 and 10 rendered and visually inspected on 18 October 2026. Forwarding heading previously inspected; full 15-page research copy retained. PDF p.5 rendered and visually inspected for the afternoon attack and withdrawal. PDF pp.6 and 13–15 rendered and visually inspected for 5–6 June operations and personnel accounting. PDF pp.2 and 9 re-rendered and visually inspected for aircraft variants, in-commission counts and morning loads. Cruiser-profile review, 18–19 October 2026: PDF pp.13–14 visually rechecked; p.13 supplies 5 June context, while p.14 / VS-6 printed p.6 supplies the 6 June afternoon sortie used in the profile.

Limits: VB-6 printed page 3 is absent between printed pp.2 and 4. Carrier identities, hit estimates and aircraft identifications are contemporary claims, not confirmed results. Aircraft returning, crews rescued and crews unaccounted for are distinct report-date categories. Times are not silently combined with the island or Japanese clocks. Not the separate Enterprise ship action report. The roster headed 2 June contains later loss/rescue annotations, not pre-battle knowledge; a missing entry is not proof of the circumstances of death. The 5 June cruiser in the VS-6 narrative is not identified here as Mogami or Mikuma. The 6 June target classifications and hit claims are not individually mapped to confirmed ships.

View full source record →
M06The Japanese Story of the Battle of Midway

Contemporary Japanese report · postwar English translation in modern web transcription

Passage: Part III, section 1, HIRYU damage subsection: abandonment and transfer to destroyers; English edition of M14’s report family

The Japanese carrier command’s reported assessment of Midway and its expectation of an American response.

Checked: Selected opening passages compared with M14. Force, attack and reconnaissance tables compared with Japanese images on 18 October 2026; Haruna aircraft-type discrepancy recorded in the chapter-four audit. Opening strike and second-attack preparation passages compared with M14 PDF pp.29–33 on 18 October 2026. Part III section 1 contact and recovery passages rechecked for Search and Decision. Akagi fire and Hiryū response passages compared with selected M39 and M14 images for The Morning Strikes. HIRYU damage subsection reread for evacuation; selected fire passages compared with M14 PDF pp.42–43. AKAGI, KAGA and SORYU damage subsections reread for the ship profiles and compared with selected M14 images; this is the same report family.

Limits: The translation and Japanese scan transmit the same report, not independent accounts. Cover numbering differs: English No.6-38, Japanese No.6-37. A retrospective command account; enemy estimates and editorial additions are not accepted as established facts. Sōryū evacuation: M14 PDF p.45 / stamped 0047 names Hamakaze and Isokaze (磯風); M06 renders the second as Isonami. The profile follows the original Japanese name.

View full source record →
M44Hammann’s loss and the care of survivors

Contemporary ship report reconstructed from memory · modern transcription

Passage: Captain’s paragraphs 5–6: Hammann’s recovery of Yorktown survivors; modern transcription

Salvage assistance, the destroyer’s sinking and Crawford’s care of wounded survivors. Antiaircraft weapons reported used, rescue duties and practical assistance alongside Yorktown.

Checked: Relevant passages and the opening memory caveat read on 18 October 2026. Original page images not inspected. Supporting-ship update: captain’s paragraphs 1 and 3–9 and appended statement reread; official NHHC page was unavailable and no original scan retrieved.

Limits: Records were lost; times and early casualty counts are provisional. The underwater explosion’s cause remains unresolved. No final death total is adopted from this report. The captain and Hartigan differ on the apparent torpedo-hit sequence; Nimitz also reports two hits on Hammann. No exact hit reconstruction or confirmed aircraft-kill total is inferred.

View full source record →

Photograph

Enlarged historical photograph

Web copy resized and compressed; original framing retained. Open image file ↗